Social and Anthropological Background for Addressing Xenophobia.

Переведенное название: Социально-антрополошические основания ксенофобии

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьянаучнаярецензирование

Выдержка

Contemporary humanity is facing a new form of exclusion. If earlier protest caused total power and economic exploitation, today in place violent ways of assembling individuals in the collective body came new media technology. Globalization turns the new totalitarianism of planetary scale. The question arises, what does it mean to “be together”? Is the totality of the citizens, every four years, taking part in the elections, or something more-for example, people, nation or just fellow, existing according to the formula: live and not bother others live. It would be good to connect on a spiritual basis, as suggested by Russian philosophers of unity, but until the time is not ripe, should create more realistic projects. Today human Association are not built on spiritual unity, and at the organizational basis and fewer rely on solidarity. Your problem is the recognition of the other, which is not a romantic fiction, and lives and works near to us in the context of a modern multi-ethnic society. It cannot be an absolute skeptic, of course, if it is not being driven into a corner, such as paring down his social rights, wages, and forces other think, drink, eat and dress, as do representatives of a big nation. The involvement of another is not only in the plane of the rational negotiation and political treaties, but also at the level of everyday communication, which is the best form of hospitality.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)265-275
Число страниц11
ЖурналJournal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences
Том11
Номер выпуска2
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2018

Предметные области Scopus

  • Антропология

Цитировать

@article{52197eab079c47c481fe0ccd7cff2986,
title = "Social and Anthropological Background for Addressing Xenophobia.",
abstract = "Contemporary humanity is facing a new form of exclusion. If earlier protest caused total power and economic exploitation, today in place violent ways of assembling individuals in the collective body came new media technology. Globalization turns the new totalitarianism of planetary scale. The question arises, what does it mean to “be together”? Is the totality of the citizens, every four years, taking part in the elections, or something more-for example, people, nation or just fellow, existing according to the formula: live and not bother others live. It would be good to connect on a spiritual basis, as suggested by Russian philosophers of unity, but until the time is not ripe, should create more realistic projects. Today human Association are not built on spiritual unity, and at the organizational basis and fewer rely on solidarity. Your problem is the recognition of the other, which is not a romantic fiction, and lives and works near to us in the context of a modern multi-ethnic society. It cannot be an absolute skeptic, of course, if it is not being driven into a corner, such as paring down his social rights, wages, and forces other think, drink, eat and dress, as do representatives of a big nation. The involvement of another is not only in the plane of the rational negotiation and political treaties, but also at the level of everyday communication, which is the best form of hospitality.",
keywords = "Alien, Enemy, Ethnicity, Friend, Hospitality, Identity, Nation, Our, People, Society, State, Xenophobia",
author = "Markov, {Boris V.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.17516/1997-1370-0221",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "265--275",
journal = "ЖУРНАЛ СИБИРСКОГО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. СЕРИЯ: ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ",
issn = "1997-1370",
publisher = "Сибирский федеральный университет",
number = "2",

}

Social and Anthropological Background for Addressing Xenophobia. / Markov, Boris V.

В: Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, Том 11, № 2, 2018, стр. 265-275.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьянаучнаярецензирование

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social and Anthropological Background for Addressing Xenophobia.

AU - Markov, Boris V.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Contemporary humanity is facing a new form of exclusion. If earlier protest caused total power and economic exploitation, today in place violent ways of assembling individuals in the collective body came new media technology. Globalization turns the new totalitarianism of planetary scale. The question arises, what does it mean to “be together”? Is the totality of the citizens, every four years, taking part in the elections, or something more-for example, people, nation or just fellow, existing according to the formula: live and not bother others live. It would be good to connect on a spiritual basis, as suggested by Russian philosophers of unity, but until the time is not ripe, should create more realistic projects. Today human Association are not built on spiritual unity, and at the organizational basis and fewer rely on solidarity. Your problem is the recognition of the other, which is not a romantic fiction, and lives and works near to us in the context of a modern multi-ethnic society. It cannot be an absolute skeptic, of course, if it is not being driven into a corner, such as paring down his social rights, wages, and forces other think, drink, eat and dress, as do representatives of a big nation. The involvement of another is not only in the plane of the rational negotiation and political treaties, but also at the level of everyday communication, which is the best form of hospitality.

AB - Contemporary humanity is facing a new form of exclusion. If earlier protest caused total power and economic exploitation, today in place violent ways of assembling individuals in the collective body came new media technology. Globalization turns the new totalitarianism of planetary scale. The question arises, what does it mean to “be together”? Is the totality of the citizens, every four years, taking part in the elections, or something more-for example, people, nation or just fellow, existing according to the formula: live and not bother others live. It would be good to connect on a spiritual basis, as suggested by Russian philosophers of unity, but until the time is not ripe, should create more realistic projects. Today human Association are not built on spiritual unity, and at the organizational basis and fewer rely on solidarity. Your problem is the recognition of the other, which is not a romantic fiction, and lives and works near to us in the context of a modern multi-ethnic society. It cannot be an absolute skeptic, of course, if it is not being driven into a corner, such as paring down his social rights, wages, and forces other think, drink, eat and dress, as do representatives of a big nation. The involvement of another is not only in the plane of the rational negotiation and political treaties, but also at the level of everyday communication, which is the best form of hospitality.

KW - Alien

KW - Enemy

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Friend

KW - Hospitality

KW - Identity

KW - Nation

KW - Our

KW - People

KW - Society

KW - State

KW - Xenophobia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057264846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17516/1997-1370-0221

DO - 10.17516/1997-1370-0221

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 265

EP - 275

JO - ЖУРНАЛ СИБИРСКОГО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. СЕРИЯ: ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ

JF - ЖУРНАЛ СИБИРСКОГО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. СЕРИЯ: ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ

SN - 1997-1370

IS - 2

ER -