Online Discourse as a Microdemocracy Tool: Towards New Discursive Epistemics for Policy Deliberation // ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016.

Andrei Chugunov, Olga Filatova, Yuri Misnikov

Результат исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференции

Выдержка

The main objective of this study is to develop approaches and test methods that could lead to a better understanding of how knowledge is generated by citizens online in the course of Internet discussion for a more democratic policy making. The eventual goal is to create a Decision Support System using the collective intelligence of online discourses. The research applies Jurgen Habermas’ concept of basic Validity Claims for analyzing the content of three online discourses in Russia in the context of the e-petition calling to revoke the law mandating to destroy the foodstuffs imported from the West. The research found that (a) the use of Validity Claims is an effective instrument of content analysis to distil specific knowledge that is collectively generated by discourse participants to discover not only dominant issues, but also reveal participants’ groups behind them; (b) the outcome of online discourses depends on the affiliation and ownership of media outlet hosting discourses. Due to their epistemic poten
Язык оригиналаанглийский
Название основной публикацииICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2016

Отпечаток

deliberation
electronics
governance
discourse
petition
intelligence
content analysis
Russia
citizen
Internet
Law
Group

Цитировать

@inproceedings{5fed100811ff44608f66cb94bd931956,
title = "Online Discourse as a Microdemocracy Tool: Towards New Discursive Epistemics for Policy Deliberation // ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016.",
abstract = "The main objective of this study is to develop approaches and test methods that could lead to a better understanding of how knowledge is generated by citizens online in the course of Internet discussion for a more democratic policy making. The eventual goal is to create a Decision Support System using the collective intelligence of online discourses. The research applies Jurgen Habermas’ concept of basic Validity Claims for analyzing the content of three online discourses in Russia in the context of the e-petition calling to revoke the law mandating to destroy the foodstuffs imported from the West. The research found that (a) the use of Validity Claims is an effective instrument of content analysis to distil specific knowledge that is collectively generated by discourse participants to discover not only dominant issues, but also reveal participants’ groups behind them; (b) the outcome of online discourses depends on the affiliation and ownership of media outlet hosting discourses. Due to their epistemic poten",
keywords = "e-Petitions, Policy Discourse, Discourse Analysis, Jurgen Habermas, Validity Claims, e-Democracy, Microdemocracy, Russia, Online Deliberation, Epistemology, Decision Support Systems",
author = "Andrei Chugunov and Olga Filatova and Yuri Misnikov",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
booktitle = "ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.",

}

Online Discourse as a Microdemocracy Tool: Towards New Discursive Epistemics for Policy Deliberation // ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016. / Chugunov, Andrei; Filatova, Olga; Misnikov, Yuri.

ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.. 2016.

Результат исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференции

TY - GEN

T1 - Online Discourse as a Microdemocracy Tool: Towards New Discursive Epistemics for Policy Deliberation // ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2016.

AU - Chugunov, Andrei

AU - Filatova, Olga

AU - Misnikov, Yuri

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The main objective of this study is to develop approaches and test methods that could lead to a better understanding of how knowledge is generated by citizens online in the course of Internet discussion for a more democratic policy making. The eventual goal is to create a Decision Support System using the collective intelligence of online discourses. The research applies Jurgen Habermas’ concept of basic Validity Claims for analyzing the content of three online discourses in Russia in the context of the e-petition calling to revoke the law mandating to destroy the foodstuffs imported from the West. The research found that (a) the use of Validity Claims is an effective instrument of content analysis to distil specific knowledge that is collectively generated by discourse participants to discover not only dominant issues, but also reveal participants’ groups behind them; (b) the outcome of online discourses depends on the affiliation and ownership of media outlet hosting discourses. Due to their epistemic poten

AB - The main objective of this study is to develop approaches and test methods that could lead to a better understanding of how knowledge is generated by citizens online in the course of Internet discussion for a more democratic policy making. The eventual goal is to create a Decision Support System using the collective intelligence of online discourses. The research applies Jurgen Habermas’ concept of basic Validity Claims for analyzing the content of three online discourses in Russia in the context of the e-petition calling to revoke the law mandating to destroy the foodstuffs imported from the West. The research found that (a) the use of Validity Claims is an effective instrument of content analysis to distil specific knowledge that is collectively generated by discourse participants to discover not only dominant issues, but also reveal participants’ groups behind them; (b) the outcome of online discourses depends on the affiliation and ownership of media outlet hosting discourses. Due to their epistemic poten

KW - e-Petitions

KW - Policy Discourse

KW - Discourse Analysis

KW - Jurgen Habermas

KW - Validity Claims

KW - e-Democracy

KW - Microdemocracy

KW - Russia

KW - Online Deliberation

KW - Epistemology

KW - Decision Support Systems

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - ICEGOV '16 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.

ER -