One hundred years of social policy transformation in Russia

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

3 Цитирования (Scopus)

Выдержка

The revolutionary transformations of 1917 should be seen as complex, rather than as linear and unambiguous. Obviously, mutual interdependence and interactions have occurred between the Revolution and Russia’s tsarist past, even if there were claims that certain historical actions or events were occur-ing for the first time in world history. I argue characterizing the USSR as a country with an 'advanced social policy' is in many ways not justifiable. The complexity of achieving a theoretical reconstruction of social policy is due to internal contradictions in society and its division into certain sectors, social groups, territories that often have conflicting interests. The Soviet ideology of equalization (uravnilovki) prevented the recognition of differences, although real politics has been very selective both in the Soviet era and now, after twenty-five years of transformation. Furthermore, the history of the last one hundred years of social policy in Russia and in the West is subject to constant changes in interpretation in social science. During one phase, policies are introduced to reduce the role of the state; in the next period we find reforms trying to give the state more powers. The aims of this overview are to reconstruct some of the forms of interdependence among individual agents and society, to clarify the role of individuals in the objective framework of Soviet and post-Soviet social policies. We proceed from the belief that, while structural factors are very important, citizens are also subjects of their own lives and can play an active role in social transformations. The history of social policy can be described through interaction of two main approaches, liberal and social-democratic, or in other words, selective and universal. This means that social policy can be addressed to certain groups of the population (workers, children, elders) or to the population as a whole. But which decisions are 'liberal' and which are 'social-democratic', or which combination is at stake at a particular moment in history, is always a matter of negotiation. Therefore, the transformation of the Imperial, then Soviet and then Russian social policies are the subject of constant discussions.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)497-514
Число страниц18
ЖурналZhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki
Том15
Номер выпуска4
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 24 дек 2017

Отпечаток

Russia
interdependence
worker's child
history
world history
interaction
Social Policy
USSR
reconstruction
ideology
social science
citizen
reform
interpretation
politics
event
Group
Society

Предметные области Scopus

  • Социология и политические науки
  • Государственное и региональное управление

Цитировать

@article{7f48e8f499214559bd55bd95b1967142,
title = "One hundred years of social policy transformation in Russia",
abstract = "The revolutionary transformations of 1917 should be seen as complex, rather than as linear and unambiguous. Obviously, mutual interdependence and interactions have occurred between the Revolution and Russia’s tsarist past, even if there were claims that certain historical actions or events were occur-ing for the first time in world history. I argue characterizing the USSR as a country with an 'advanced social policy' is in many ways not justifiable. The complexity of achieving a theoretical reconstruction of social policy is due to internal contradictions in society and its division into certain sectors, social groups, territories that often have conflicting interests. The Soviet ideology of equalization (uravnilovki) prevented the recognition of differences, although real politics has been very selective both in the Soviet era and now, after twenty-five years of transformation. Furthermore, the history of the last one hundred years of social policy in Russia and in the West is subject to constant changes in interpretation in social science. During one phase, policies are introduced to reduce the role of the state; in the next period we find reforms trying to give the state more powers. The aims of this overview are to reconstruct some of the forms of interdependence among individual agents and society, to clarify the role of individuals in the objective framework of Soviet and post-Soviet social policies. We proceed from the belief that, while structural factors are very important, citizens are also subjects of their own lives and can play an active role in social transformations. The history of social policy can be described through interaction of two main approaches, liberal and social-democratic, or in other words, selective and universal. This means that social policy can be addressed to certain groups of the population (workers, children, elders) or to the population as a whole. But which decisions are 'liberal' and which are 'social-democratic', or which combination is at stake at a particular moment in history, is always a matter of negotiation. Therefore, the transformation of the Imperial, then Soviet and then Russian social policies are the subject of constant discussions.",
keywords = "Individual, Insurance, Selectivity, Social policy, Solidarity, Universality",
author = "Irina Grigoryeva",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "24",
doi = "10.17323/727-0634-2017-15-4-497-514",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "497--514",
journal = "ЖУРНАЛ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ",
issn = "1727-0634",
publisher = "Tsentr Social'noi Politiki i Gendernykh Issledovanii",
number = "4",

}

One hundred years of social policy transformation in Russia. / Grigoryeva, Irina.

В: Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki, Том 15, № 4, 24.12.2017, стр. 497-514.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

TY - JOUR

T1 - One hundred years of social policy transformation in Russia

AU - Grigoryeva, Irina

PY - 2017/12/24

Y1 - 2017/12/24

N2 - The revolutionary transformations of 1917 should be seen as complex, rather than as linear and unambiguous. Obviously, mutual interdependence and interactions have occurred between the Revolution and Russia’s tsarist past, even if there were claims that certain historical actions or events were occur-ing for the first time in world history. I argue characterizing the USSR as a country with an 'advanced social policy' is in many ways not justifiable. The complexity of achieving a theoretical reconstruction of social policy is due to internal contradictions in society and its division into certain sectors, social groups, territories that often have conflicting interests. The Soviet ideology of equalization (uravnilovki) prevented the recognition of differences, although real politics has been very selective both in the Soviet era and now, after twenty-five years of transformation. Furthermore, the history of the last one hundred years of social policy in Russia and in the West is subject to constant changes in interpretation in social science. During one phase, policies are introduced to reduce the role of the state; in the next period we find reforms trying to give the state more powers. The aims of this overview are to reconstruct some of the forms of interdependence among individual agents and society, to clarify the role of individuals in the objective framework of Soviet and post-Soviet social policies. We proceed from the belief that, while structural factors are very important, citizens are also subjects of their own lives and can play an active role in social transformations. The history of social policy can be described through interaction of two main approaches, liberal and social-democratic, or in other words, selective and universal. This means that social policy can be addressed to certain groups of the population (workers, children, elders) or to the population as a whole. But which decisions are 'liberal' and which are 'social-democratic', or which combination is at stake at a particular moment in history, is always a matter of negotiation. Therefore, the transformation of the Imperial, then Soviet and then Russian social policies are the subject of constant discussions.

AB - The revolutionary transformations of 1917 should be seen as complex, rather than as linear and unambiguous. Obviously, mutual interdependence and interactions have occurred between the Revolution and Russia’s tsarist past, even if there were claims that certain historical actions or events were occur-ing for the first time in world history. I argue characterizing the USSR as a country with an 'advanced social policy' is in many ways not justifiable. The complexity of achieving a theoretical reconstruction of social policy is due to internal contradictions in society and its division into certain sectors, social groups, territories that often have conflicting interests. The Soviet ideology of equalization (uravnilovki) prevented the recognition of differences, although real politics has been very selective both in the Soviet era and now, after twenty-five years of transformation. Furthermore, the history of the last one hundred years of social policy in Russia and in the West is subject to constant changes in interpretation in social science. During one phase, policies are introduced to reduce the role of the state; in the next period we find reforms trying to give the state more powers. The aims of this overview are to reconstruct some of the forms of interdependence among individual agents and society, to clarify the role of individuals in the objective framework of Soviet and post-Soviet social policies. We proceed from the belief that, while structural factors are very important, citizens are also subjects of their own lives and can play an active role in social transformations. The history of social policy can be described through interaction of two main approaches, liberal and social-democratic, or in other words, selective and universal. This means that social policy can be addressed to certain groups of the population (workers, children, elders) or to the population as a whole. But which decisions are 'liberal' and which are 'social-democratic', or which combination is at stake at a particular moment in history, is always a matter of negotiation. Therefore, the transformation of the Imperial, then Soviet and then Russian social policies are the subject of constant discussions.

KW - Individual

KW - Insurance

KW - Selectivity

KW - Social policy

KW - Solidarity

KW - Universality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039838184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17323/727-0634-2017-15-4-497-514

DO - 10.17323/727-0634-2017-15-4-497-514

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85039838184

VL - 15

SP - 497

EP - 514

JO - ЖУРНАЛ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ

JF - ЖУРНАЛ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ

SN - 1727-0634

IS - 4

ER -