Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers

Наталия Павловна Кириллова, Елена Николаевна Лисанюк

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья

Выдержка

We examine the reasons of the judicial mistake in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by F. Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, the adversary and the investigative, and that the three conceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent the judicial mistakes, when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.
Язык оригиналаанглийский
ЖурналВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ
Номер выпуска48
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2019

Предметные области Scopus

  • Философия
  • Право

Ключевые слова

  • truth
  • legal argumentation
  • adversary and investigative process models
  • judicial mistake
  • The Karamazov Brothers

Цитировать

Кириллова, Наталия Павловна ; Лисанюк, Елена Николаевна. / Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers. В: ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. 2019 ; № 48.
@article{c45a2cc9b2754b6d835ddf8baa164a18,
title = "Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers",
abstract = "We examine the reasons of the judicial mistake in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by F. Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, the adversary and the investigative, and that the three conceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent the judicial mistakes, when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.",
keywords = "truth, legal argumentation, adversary and investigative process models, judicial mistake, The Karamazov Brothers",
author = "Кириллова, {Наталия Павловна} and Лисанюк, {Елена Николаевна}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ",
issn = "1998-863X",
publisher = "Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет",
number = "48",

}

Кириллова, НП & Лисанюк, ЕН 2019, 'Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers', ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, № 48.

Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers. / Кириллова, Наталия Павловна; Лисанюк, Елена Николаевна.

В: ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, № 48, 2019.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers

AU - Кириллова, Наталия Павловна

AU - Лисанюк, Елена Николаевна

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We examine the reasons of the judicial mistake in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by F. Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, the adversary and the investigative, and that the three conceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent the judicial mistakes, when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.

AB - We examine the reasons of the judicial mistake in the Dmitry Karamazov case depicted by F. Dostoevsky in The Karamazov Brothers and argue that the truth can and should be established in both of the process types, the adversary and the investigative, and that the three conceptions of truth, referential, inferential and pragmatic, play an evaluative role in that. The Dmitry Karamazov case shows that the formal view of the truth suffices for deciding a case, but it cannot prevent the judicial mistakes, when the epistemological ideal of the material truth falls into oblivion.

KW - truth

KW - legal argumentation

KW - adversary and investigative process models

KW - judicial mistake

KW - The Karamazov Brothers

M3 - Article

JO - ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ

SN - 1998-863X

IS - 48

ER -

Кириллова НП, Лисанюк ЕН. Kirillova N. P., Lisanyuk E. N. Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Karamazov Brothers. ВЕСТНИК ТОМСКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ФИЛОСОФИЯ. СОЦИОЛОГИЯ. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. 2019;(48).