Ionization of the Polar Atmosphere by Energetic Electron Precipitation Retrieved From Balloon Measurements

Standard

Ionization of the Polar Atmosphere by Energetic Electron Precipitation Retrieved From Balloon Measurements. / Mironova, I.A.; Artamonov, A.A.; Bazilevskaya, G. A. ; Rozanov, E.V.; Kovaltsov, G. A. ; Makhmutov, V. S. ; Mishev, A.; Karagodin, A.V.

в: Geophysical Research Letters, Том 46, № 2, 28.01.2019, стр. 990-996.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Author

Mironova, I.A. ; Artamonov, A.A. ; Bazilevskaya, G. A. ; Rozanov, E.V. ; Kovaltsov, G. A. ; Makhmutov, V. S. ; Mishev, A. ; Karagodin, A.V. / Ionization of the Polar Atmosphere by Energetic Electron Precipitation Retrieved From Balloon Measurements. в: Geophysical Research Letters. 2019 ; Том 46, № 2. стр. 990-996.

BibTeX

@article{3366bdca1290419a8c74935faa5986cd,

title = "Ionization of the Polar Atmosphere by Energetic Electron Precipitation Retrieved From Balloon Measurements",

abstract = "We retrieve ionization rates in the atmosphere caused by energetic electron precipitation from balloon observations in the polar atmosphere and compare them against ionization rates recommended for the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. In our retrieval procedure, we consider the precipitating electrons with energies from about tens of keV to 5 MeV. Our simulations with 1-D radiative-convective model with interactive neutral and ion chemistry show that the difference of the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project and balloon-based ionization rate can lead to underestimation of the NOx enhancement by more than 100% and ozone loss up to 25% in the mesosphere. The atmospheric response is different below 50 km due to considering highly energetic electrons, but it is not important because the absolute values of atmospheric impact is tiny. Ionization rates obtained from the balloon observations reveal a high variability.",

keywords = "atmospheric response, balloon measurements, EEP CMIP6, energetic electron precipitation (EEP), ionization rates, polar atmosphere, PARTICLE, CRACEPII, MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE, MODEL, RADIATION",

author = "I.A. Mironova and A.A. Artamonov and Bazilevskaya, {G. A.} and E.V. Rozanov and Kovaltsov, {G. A.} and Makhmutov, {V. S.} and A. Mishev and A.V. Karagodin",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1029/2018GL079421",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "990--996",

journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",

issn = "0094-8276",

publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ionization of the Polar Atmosphere by Energetic Electron Precipitation Retrieved From Balloon Measurements

AU - Mironova, I.A.

AU - Artamonov, A.A.

AU - Bazilevskaya, G. A.

AU - Rozanov, E.V.

AU - Kovaltsov, G. A.

AU - Makhmutov, V. S.

AU - Mishev, A.

AU - Karagodin, A.V.

PY - 2019/1/28

Y1 - 2019/1/28

N2 - We retrieve ionization rates in the atmosphere caused by energetic electron precipitation from balloon observations in the polar atmosphere and compare them against ionization rates recommended for the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. In our retrieval procedure, we consider the precipitating electrons with energies from about tens of keV to 5 MeV. Our simulations with 1-D radiative-convective model with interactive neutral and ion chemistry show that the difference of the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project and balloon-based ionization rate can lead to underestimation of the NOx enhancement by more than 100% and ozone loss up to 25% in the mesosphere. The atmospheric response is different below 50 km due to considering highly energetic electrons, but it is not important because the absolute values of atmospheric impact is tiny. Ionization rates obtained from the balloon observations reveal a high variability.

AB - We retrieve ionization rates in the atmosphere caused by energetic electron precipitation from balloon observations in the polar atmosphere and compare them against ionization rates recommended for the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. In our retrieval procedure, we consider the precipitating electrons with energies from about tens of keV to 5 MeV. Our simulations with 1-D radiative-convective model with interactive neutral and ion chemistry show that the difference of the Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project and balloon-based ionization rate can lead to underestimation of the NOx enhancement by more than 100% and ozone loss up to 25% in the mesosphere. The atmospheric response is different below 50 km due to considering highly energetic electrons, but it is not important because the absolute values of atmospheric impact is tiny. Ionization rates obtained from the balloon observations reveal a high variability.

KW - atmospheric response

KW - balloon measurements

KW - EEP CMIP6

KW - energetic electron precipitation (EEP)

KW - ionization rates

KW - polar atmosphere

KW - PARTICLE

KW - CRACEPII

KW - MIDDLE ATMOSPHERE

KW - MODEL

KW - RADIATION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060176704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/ionization-polar-atmosphere-energetic-electron-precipitation-retrieved-balloon-measurements

U2 - 10.1029/2018GL079421

DO - 10.1029/2018GL079421

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060176704

VL - 46

SP - 990

EP - 996

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

SN - 0094-8276

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 37491346