Graphetic designation of phonological features as a guide for the rationalisation of alphabetic

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

Выдержка

Writing and Evidence for the Reality of Phonological Categories The evolution of writing (from ideography to alphabet) is connected with the tendency to denote the smallest segmental units of a language system. The adequacy of graphetics depends on its ability to reproduce all phonemic distinctions. Whereas scientific transcription requires a one-to-one correspondence of phoneme and grapheme, various tools for reduction of grapheme inventory are applied in practical writing systems. This reduction is possible when the phonological structure of a language system is taken into account and the so-called featural elements of script develop, with phonemic traits acquiring unified graphetic expression (generalised elements of the basic symbol, diacritics, digraph series and modification of adjacent letters). Examples of such optimisation can be found both in conscious efforts of professional linguists (transcription adjustment, alphabet development) and in natural evolution of writing systems (cfr. "syllable principle of the Russian graphetics"), as well as in projects of amateur enthusiasts with their intuitive methods, which are very successful at times. The article analyses some aspects of alphabet making and rationalisation in the ussr in the 1920s-30s. For example, Rosalija Šor brought into question speakers' awareness of phonological features; she criticised the universality of Nikolaj Jakovlev's mathematical formula of the alphabet. On the other hand, the speaker's linguistic awareness manifested itself in Axmet Baitursynov's suprasegmental sign for sound harmony in Kazakh, readily accepted by the public at large. There is also discussion of Ivan Tolmačev's project of the rationalisation of the Russian alphabet presented to the first Soviet People's Commissar for Education Anatolij Lunačarskij in 1929, discovered recently in the archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)253-274
Число страниц22
ЖурналStudi Slavistici
Том14
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 янв 2017

Отпечаток

rationalization
Academy of Sciences
amateur
language
symbol
linguistics
Rationalization
Alphabet
Designation
Phonological Features
ability
evidence
education
Language
Phonemics
Writing Systems
Transcription
Grapheme

Предметные области Scopus

  • Культурология
  • Языки и лингвистика
  • Языки и лингвистика
  • Литературоведение и теория литературы

Цитировать

@article{8a618e5caf064dbd99653ef181c3416c,
title = "Graphetic designation of phonological features as a guide for the rationalisation of alphabetic",
abstract = "Writing and Evidence for the Reality of Phonological Categories The evolution of writing (from ideography to alphabet) is connected with the tendency to denote the smallest segmental units of a language system. The adequacy of graphetics depends on its ability to reproduce all phonemic distinctions. Whereas scientific transcription requires a one-to-one correspondence of phoneme and grapheme, various tools for reduction of grapheme inventory are applied in practical writing systems. This reduction is possible when the phonological structure of a language system is taken into account and the so-called featural elements of script develop, with phonemic traits acquiring unified graphetic expression (generalised elements of the basic symbol, diacritics, digraph series and modification of adjacent letters). Examples of such optimisation can be found both in conscious efforts of professional linguists (transcription adjustment, alphabet development) and in natural evolution of writing systems (cfr. {"}syllable principle of the Russian graphetics{"}), as well as in projects of amateur enthusiasts with their intuitive methods, which are very successful at times. The article analyses some aspects of alphabet making and rationalisation in the ussr in the 1920s-30s. For example, Rosalija Šor brought into question speakers' awareness of phonological features; she criticised the universality of Nikolaj Jakovlev's mathematical formula of the alphabet. On the other hand, the speaker's linguistic awareness manifested itself in Axmet Baitursynov's suprasegmental sign for sound harmony in Kazakh, readily accepted by the public at large. There is also discussion of Ivan Tolmačev's project of the rationalisation of the Russian alphabet presented to the first Soviet People's Commissar for Education Anatolij Lunačarskij in 1929, discovered recently in the archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences.",
keywords = "Graphetics, History of writing, Language planning in the ussr (1920s-1930s), Phonology",
author = "Andronov, {Aleksey Viktorovič}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13128/Studi_Slavis-21946",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "253--274",
journal = "Studi Slavistici",
issn = "1824-761X",
publisher = "Firenze University Press",

}

Graphetic designation of phonological features as a guide for the rationalisation of alphabetic. / Andronov, Aleksey Viktorovič.

В: Studi Slavistici, Том 14, 01.01.2017, стр. 253-274.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graphetic designation of phonological features as a guide for the rationalisation of alphabetic

AU - Andronov, Aleksey Viktorovič

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Writing and Evidence for the Reality of Phonological Categories The evolution of writing (from ideography to alphabet) is connected with the tendency to denote the smallest segmental units of a language system. The adequacy of graphetics depends on its ability to reproduce all phonemic distinctions. Whereas scientific transcription requires a one-to-one correspondence of phoneme and grapheme, various tools for reduction of grapheme inventory are applied in practical writing systems. This reduction is possible when the phonological structure of a language system is taken into account and the so-called featural elements of script develop, with phonemic traits acquiring unified graphetic expression (generalised elements of the basic symbol, diacritics, digraph series and modification of adjacent letters). Examples of such optimisation can be found both in conscious efforts of professional linguists (transcription adjustment, alphabet development) and in natural evolution of writing systems (cfr. "syllable principle of the Russian graphetics"), as well as in projects of amateur enthusiasts with their intuitive methods, which are very successful at times. The article analyses some aspects of alphabet making and rationalisation in the ussr in the 1920s-30s. For example, Rosalija Šor brought into question speakers' awareness of phonological features; she criticised the universality of Nikolaj Jakovlev's mathematical formula of the alphabet. On the other hand, the speaker's linguistic awareness manifested itself in Axmet Baitursynov's suprasegmental sign for sound harmony in Kazakh, readily accepted by the public at large. There is also discussion of Ivan Tolmačev's project of the rationalisation of the Russian alphabet presented to the first Soviet People's Commissar for Education Anatolij Lunačarskij in 1929, discovered recently in the archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

AB - Writing and Evidence for the Reality of Phonological Categories The evolution of writing (from ideography to alphabet) is connected with the tendency to denote the smallest segmental units of a language system. The adequacy of graphetics depends on its ability to reproduce all phonemic distinctions. Whereas scientific transcription requires a one-to-one correspondence of phoneme and grapheme, various tools for reduction of grapheme inventory are applied in practical writing systems. This reduction is possible when the phonological structure of a language system is taken into account and the so-called featural elements of script develop, with phonemic traits acquiring unified graphetic expression (generalised elements of the basic symbol, diacritics, digraph series and modification of adjacent letters). Examples of such optimisation can be found both in conscious efforts of professional linguists (transcription adjustment, alphabet development) and in natural evolution of writing systems (cfr. "syllable principle of the Russian graphetics"), as well as in projects of amateur enthusiasts with their intuitive methods, which are very successful at times. The article analyses some aspects of alphabet making and rationalisation in the ussr in the 1920s-30s. For example, Rosalija Šor brought into question speakers' awareness of phonological features; she criticised the universality of Nikolaj Jakovlev's mathematical formula of the alphabet. On the other hand, the speaker's linguistic awareness manifested itself in Axmet Baitursynov's suprasegmental sign for sound harmony in Kazakh, readily accepted by the public at large. There is also discussion of Ivan Tolmačev's project of the rationalisation of the Russian alphabet presented to the first Soviet People's Commissar for Education Anatolij Lunačarskij in 1929, discovered recently in the archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

KW - Graphetics

KW - History of writing

KW - Language planning in the ussr (1920s-1930s)

KW - Phonology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039742787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13128/Studi_Slavis-21946

DO - 10.13128/Studi_Slavis-21946

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85039742787

VL - 14

SP - 253

EP - 274

JO - Studi Slavistici

JF - Studi Slavistici

SN - 1824-761X

ER -