Standard

An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2). / Rykin, Pavel ; Telitsin, Nikolai .

в: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Том 140, № 2, 2020, стр. 287-299.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Rykin, P & Telitsin, N 2020, 'An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2)', Journal of the American Oriental Society, Том. 140, № 2, стр. 287-299. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287

APA

Rykin, P., & Telitsin, N. (2020). An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2). Journal of the American Oriental Society, 140(2), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287

Vancouver

Rykin P, Telitsin N. An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2). Journal of the American Oriental Society. 2020;140(2):287-299. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287

Author

Rykin, Pavel ; Telitsin, Nikolai . / An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2). в: Journal of the American Oriental Society. 2020 ; Том 140, № 2. стр. 287-299.

BibTeX

@article{39ba0bd07f1741fcb7ec9a786513ef44,
title = "An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (To{\~n} S2)",
abstract = "The paper deals with the etymology of the personal names Qun{\"i} S{\"a}{\ng}{\"u}n and To{\ng}ra Sim{\"a} appearing in the ninth line of the Old Turkic Tonyukuk inscription (ca. 716). These names are borne by the envoys sent by the kagan of the Tokuz Oghuz to the Chinese and Khitan, respectively, to conclude a military alliance against the Turks. Both names have the same structure, a combination of an ethnonym (qun({\"i}) vs. to{\ng}ra), referring to a tribal unit within the Tiele 鐵勒 confederation, and a title of Chinese origin (s{\"a}{\ng}{\"u}n vs. sim{\"a}). Based on a thorough analysis of historical and philological data, the authors try to establish possible ethnolinguistic grounds for the Tokuz Oghuz mission, which have so far eluded researchers of the inscription and can be fully restored only in the light of the latest discoveries in the history and philology of Inner Asia of the Old Turkic period, e.g., the decipherment of the famous Kh{\"u}is Tolgoi inscription from Mongolia.",
author = "Pavel Rykin and Nikolai Telitsin",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "287--299",
journal = "Journal of the American Oriental Society",
issn = "0003-0279",
publisher = "American Oriental Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Interpretation of Two Personal Names in the Ninth Line of the Tonyukuk Inscription (Toñ S2)

AU - Rykin, Pavel

AU - Telitsin, Nikolai

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The paper deals with the etymology of the personal names Qunï Säŋün and Toŋra Simä appearing in the ninth line of the Old Turkic Tonyukuk inscription (ca. 716). These names are borne by the envoys sent by the kagan of the Tokuz Oghuz to the Chinese and Khitan, respectively, to conclude a military alliance against the Turks. Both names have the same structure, a combination of an ethnonym (qun(ï) vs. toŋra), referring to a tribal unit within the Tiele 鐵勒 confederation, and a title of Chinese origin (säŋün vs. simä). Based on a thorough analysis of historical and philological data, the authors try to establish possible ethnolinguistic grounds for the Tokuz Oghuz mission, which have so far eluded researchers of the inscription and can be fully restored only in the light of the latest discoveries in the history and philology of Inner Asia of the Old Turkic period, e.g., the decipherment of the famous Khüis Tolgoi inscription from Mongolia.

AB - The paper deals with the etymology of the personal names Qunï Säŋün and Toŋra Simä appearing in the ninth line of the Old Turkic Tonyukuk inscription (ca. 716). These names are borne by the envoys sent by the kagan of the Tokuz Oghuz to the Chinese and Khitan, respectively, to conclude a military alliance against the Turks. Both names have the same structure, a combination of an ethnonym (qun(ï) vs. toŋra), referring to a tribal unit within the Tiele 鐵勒 confederation, and a title of Chinese origin (säŋün vs. simä). Based on a thorough analysis of historical and philological data, the authors try to establish possible ethnolinguistic grounds for the Tokuz Oghuz mission, which have so far eluded researchers of the inscription and can be fully restored only in the light of the latest discoveries in the history and philology of Inner Asia of the Old Turkic period, e.g., the decipherment of the famous Khüis Tolgoi inscription from Mongolia.

U2 - 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287

DO - 10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0287

M3 - Article

VL - 140

SP - 287

EP - 299

JO - Journal of the American Oriental Society

JF - Journal of the American Oriental Society

SN - 0003-0279

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 61462799