Standard

ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ. / Popov, S V; Zaĭtsev, É V; Petrova, Iu A; Guseĭnov, R G; Topuzov, T M.

в: Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999), № 3, 31.08.2013, стр. 61-4, 66-7.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

Harvard

Popov, SV, Zaĭtsev, ÉV, Petrova, IA, Guseĭnov, RG & Topuzov, TM 2013, 'ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ', Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999), № 3, стр. 61-4, 66-7.

APA

Popov, S. V., Zaĭtsev, É. V., Petrova, I. A., Guseĭnov, R. G., & Topuzov, T. M. (2013). ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ. Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999), (3), 61-4, 66-7.

Vancouver

Popov SV, Zaĭtsev ÉV, Petrova IA, Guseĭnov RG, Topuzov TM. ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ. Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999). 2013 Авг. 31;(3):61-4, 66-7.

Author

Popov, S V ; Zaĭtsev, É V ; Petrova, Iu A ; Guseĭnov, R G ; Topuzov, T M. / ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ. в: Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999). 2013 ; № 3. стр. 61-4, 66-7.

BibTeX

@article{a624985364d44c10be7364f20ef1bab3,
title = "ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ",
abstract = "The experience of performing 44 partial nephrectomies using laparoscopic and lumboscopic approaches is presented. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of hemostasis when performing nephron sparing interventions was conducted. It is shown that physical methods of hemostasis do not meet the necessary requirements, increasing warm ischemia time and the risk of intraoperative blood loss, and makes it difficult to visualize the boundaries of resection. Pilot study using histological assessment methods proved negative effects of high-frequency energy on parenchyma, which does not allow to recommend this method of hemostasis in nephron sparing surgery. We believe that currently ligature method in partial nephrectomy remains the only reliable and safe method for the achievement of final hemostasis.",
keywords = "Aged, Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control, Female, Hemostasis, Surgical/methods, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy/methods, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies",
author = "Popov, {S V} and Zaĭtsev, {{\'E} V} and Petrova, {Iu A} and Guseĭnov, {R G} and Topuzov, {T M}",
year = "2013",
month = aug,
day = "31",
language = "русский",
pages = "61--4, 66--7",
journal = "УРОЛОГИЯ",
issn = "1728-2985",
publisher = "Медицина",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ВЕРХНИЙ УРЕТЕРОПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРОАНАСТОМОЗ ПРИ ОБСТРУКЦИИ МОЧЕТОЧНИКА НИЖНЕЙ ПОЛОВИНЫ УДВОЕННОЙ ПОЧКИ

AU - Popov, S V

AU - Zaĭtsev, É V

AU - Petrova, Iu A

AU - Guseĭnov, R G

AU - Topuzov, T M

PY - 2013/8/31

Y1 - 2013/8/31

N2 - The experience of performing 44 partial nephrectomies using laparoscopic and lumboscopic approaches is presented. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of hemostasis when performing nephron sparing interventions was conducted. It is shown that physical methods of hemostasis do not meet the necessary requirements, increasing warm ischemia time and the risk of intraoperative blood loss, and makes it difficult to visualize the boundaries of resection. Pilot study using histological assessment methods proved negative effects of high-frequency energy on parenchyma, which does not allow to recommend this method of hemostasis in nephron sparing surgery. We believe that currently ligature method in partial nephrectomy remains the only reliable and safe method for the achievement of final hemostasis.

AB - The experience of performing 44 partial nephrectomies using laparoscopic and lumboscopic approaches is presented. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of hemostasis when performing nephron sparing interventions was conducted. It is shown that physical methods of hemostasis do not meet the necessary requirements, increasing warm ischemia time and the risk of intraoperative blood loss, and makes it difficult to visualize the boundaries of resection. Pilot study using histological assessment methods proved negative effects of high-frequency energy on parenchyma, which does not allow to recommend this method of hemostasis in nephron sparing surgery. We believe that currently ligature method in partial nephrectomy remains the only reliable and safe method for the achievement of final hemostasis.

KW - Aged

KW - Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control

KW - Female

KW - Hemostasis, Surgical/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Laparoscopy/methods

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Nephrectomy/methods

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Retrospective Studies

M3 - статья

C2 - 23987052

SP - 61-4, 66-7

JO - УРОЛОГИЯ

JF - УРОЛОГИЯ

SN - 1728-2985

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 39053212