К вопросу о зеркалах и химерах

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

Выдержка

This article contains some response to critics who have written about the author's book "Mirrors and the Chimeras. On the emergence of an Old Russian State". These articles were written by P. I. Gaydenko and V. V. Puzanov. The author of the article and of the book is grateful for the high estimation of some aspects of his research and sees some weak sides of the book himself. For example, he could not take into account all works by foreign historians. The matter is that the material related to this subject matter is enormous and is dispersed among different and rare publications. Searching out relevant works must continue in the near future, but for this purpose great efforts are necessary. First of all, the author attempts to give answers which he calls peripheral problems. He means the title of his book, the language, and the images which he uses. All this represents an effort to make his work more interesting to his readers; but images also carry semantic value. The author has not the opportunity to argue historical problems, because for this reason one has to mobilize other works of the author, all his complex conceptions in a work of historiography. But anyway the author persists in his opinion on these historical problems. The main task of his book was to study the adventures of a "democratic path" in Russian polito-genesis. The author notes that the critics agree with his main idea and with his division into periods of Russian historiography. They criticized the author's manner of conducting polemics. In this article the author attempts to explain his approach.

Язык оригиналарусский
Страницы (с-по)627-637
Число страниц11
ЖурналVestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Istoriya
Том62
Номер выпуска3
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - сен 2017

Предметные области Scopus

  • История

Цитировать

@article{5857f41307bb44618aea2029c97f4df5,
title = "К вопросу о зеркалах и химерах",
abstract = "This article contains some response to critics who have written about the author's book {"}Mirrors and the Chimeras. On the emergence of an Old Russian State{"}. These articles were written by P. I. Gaydenko and V. V. Puzanov. The author of the article and of the book is grateful for the high estimation of some aspects of his research and sees some weak sides of the book himself. For example, he could not take into account all works by foreign historians. The matter is that the material related to this subject matter is enormous and is dispersed among different and rare publications. Searching out relevant works must continue in the near future, but for this purpose great efforts are necessary. First of all, the author attempts to give answers which he calls peripheral problems. He means the title of his book, the language, and the images which he uses. All this represents an effort to make his work more interesting to his readers; but images also carry semantic value. The author has not the opportunity to argue historical problems, because for this reason one has to mobilize other works of the author, all his complex conceptions in a work of historiography. But anyway the author persists in his opinion on these historical problems. The main task of his book was to study the adventures of a {"}democratic path{"} in Russian polito-genesis. The author notes that the critics agree with his main idea and with his division into periods of Russian historiography. They criticized the author's manner of conducting polemics. In this article the author attempts to explain his approach.",
keywords = "{"}Democratic{"} theory, Chimeras, Historiography, Kievan Rus', Mirrors, P. I. Gaydenko, Politogenesis, V. V. Puzanov",
author = "Dvornichenko, {A. Yu}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.313",
language = "русский",
volume = "62",
pages = "627--637",
journal = "ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ",
issn = "1812-9323",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

К вопросу о зеркалах и химерах. / Dvornichenko, A. Yu.

В: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Istoriya, Том 62, № 3, 09.2017, стр. 627-637.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхОбзорная статья

TY - JOUR

T1 - К вопросу о зеркалах и химерах

AU - Dvornichenko, A. Yu

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - This article contains some response to critics who have written about the author's book "Mirrors and the Chimeras. On the emergence of an Old Russian State". These articles were written by P. I. Gaydenko and V. V. Puzanov. The author of the article and of the book is grateful for the high estimation of some aspects of his research and sees some weak sides of the book himself. For example, he could not take into account all works by foreign historians. The matter is that the material related to this subject matter is enormous and is dispersed among different and rare publications. Searching out relevant works must continue in the near future, but for this purpose great efforts are necessary. First of all, the author attempts to give answers which he calls peripheral problems. He means the title of his book, the language, and the images which he uses. All this represents an effort to make his work more interesting to his readers; but images also carry semantic value. The author has not the opportunity to argue historical problems, because for this reason one has to mobilize other works of the author, all his complex conceptions in a work of historiography. But anyway the author persists in his opinion on these historical problems. The main task of his book was to study the adventures of a "democratic path" in Russian polito-genesis. The author notes that the critics agree with his main idea and with his division into periods of Russian historiography. They criticized the author's manner of conducting polemics. In this article the author attempts to explain his approach.

AB - This article contains some response to critics who have written about the author's book "Mirrors and the Chimeras. On the emergence of an Old Russian State". These articles were written by P. I. Gaydenko and V. V. Puzanov. The author of the article and of the book is grateful for the high estimation of some aspects of his research and sees some weak sides of the book himself. For example, he could not take into account all works by foreign historians. The matter is that the material related to this subject matter is enormous and is dispersed among different and rare publications. Searching out relevant works must continue in the near future, but for this purpose great efforts are necessary. First of all, the author attempts to give answers which he calls peripheral problems. He means the title of his book, the language, and the images which he uses. All this represents an effort to make his work more interesting to his readers; but images also carry semantic value. The author has not the opportunity to argue historical problems, because for this reason one has to mobilize other works of the author, all his complex conceptions in a work of historiography. But anyway the author persists in his opinion on these historical problems. The main task of his book was to study the adventures of a "democratic path" in Russian polito-genesis. The author notes that the critics agree with his main idea and with his division into periods of Russian historiography. They criticized the author's manner of conducting polemics. In this article the author attempts to explain his approach.

KW - "Democratic" theory

KW - Chimeras

KW - Historiography

KW - Kievan Rus'

KW - Mirrors

KW - P. I. Gaydenko

KW - Politogenesis

KW - V. V. Puzanov

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031101430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.313

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2017.313

M3 - Обзорная статья

AN - SCOPUS:85031101430

VL - 62

SP - 627

EP - 637

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 1812-9323

IS - 3

ER -