Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice

Переведенное название: Блокчейн и проблема процедурной справедливости публичного выбора.

Результат исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференциинаучнаярецензирование

Выдержка

In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Название основной публикацииDigital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers
РедакторыAlexander V. Boukhanovsky, Andrei V. Chugunov, Daniel A. Alexandrov, Yury Kabanov, Olessia Koltsova
ИздательSpringer
Страницы13-23
Число страниц11
ISBN (электронное издание)978-3-030-02843-5
ISBN (печатное издание)9783030028428
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 янв 2018
Событие3rd International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, DTGS 2018 - St. Petersburg, Российская Федерация
Продолжительность: 30 мая 20182 июн 2018

Серия публикаций

НазваниеCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Том858
ISSN (печатное издание)1865-0929

Конференция

Конференция3rd International Conference on Digital Transformation and Global Society, DTGS 2018
СтранаРоссийская Федерация
ГородSt. Petersburg
Период30/05/182/06/18

Предметные области Scopus

  • Компьютерные науки (все)
  • Математика (все)

Цитировать

Smorgunov, L. (2018). Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. В A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, D. A. Alexandrov, Y. Kabanov, & O. Koltsova (Ред.), Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers (стр. 13-23). [2] (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Том 858). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2
Smorgunov, Leonid. / Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers. редактор / Alexander V. Boukhanovsky ; Andrei V. Chugunov ; Daniel A. Alexandrov ; Yury Kabanov ; Olessia Koltsova. Springer, 2018. стр. 13-23 (Communications in Computer and Information Science).
@inproceedings{3b0f8186761e4836b11cc5f287e5932b,
title = "Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice",
abstract = "In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).",
keywords = "Active citizen, Autonomous identity, Blockchain, Collaboration, Procedural justice, Reciprocity, Reputation, Trust",
author = "Leonid Smorgunov",
note = "Smorgunov L. Blockchain and a Problem of Procedural Justice of Public Choice. Digital Transformation and Global Society. Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 30 – June 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Verlag: Springer International Publishing, 2018, p. 13-23.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030028428",
series = "Communications in Computer and Information Science",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "13--23",
editor = "Boukhanovsky, {Alexander V.} and Chugunov, {Andrei V.} and Alexandrov, {Daniel A.} and Yury Kabanov and Olessia Koltsova",
booktitle = "Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers",
address = "Germany",

}

Smorgunov, L 2018, Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. в AV Boukhanovsky, AV Chugunov, DA Alexandrov, Y Kabanov & O Koltsova (ред.), Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers., 2, Communications in Computer and Information Science, том. 858, Springer, стр. 13-23, St. Petersburg, Российская Федерация, 30/05/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2

Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. / Smorgunov, Leonid.

Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers. ред. / Alexander V. Boukhanovsky; Andrei V. Chugunov; Daniel A. Alexandrov; Yury Kabanov; Olessia Koltsova. Springer, 2018. стр. 13-23 2 (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Том 858).

Результат исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборнике материалов конференциинаучнаярецензирование

TY - GEN

T1 - Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice

AU - Smorgunov, Leonid

N1 - Smorgunov L. Blockchain and a Problem of Procedural Justice of Public Choice. Digital Transformation and Global Society. Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 30 – June 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. Verlag: Springer International Publishing, 2018, p. 13-23.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).

AB - In public policy theory there is a problem of just procedure which could be used in obtaining a fair result in decision. Blockchain as a network of distributed registers is often positioned as an institution ensuring the fairness of decisions by voting on the basis of a consensual procedure. Consensus is achieved in the blockchain interactions through various algorithms (Proof of Work, Proof of Stake, Byzantine Fault Tolerance, Modified Federated Byzantine Agreement) that provide different rules for a procedural justice. Current political theory distinguishes between pure, perfect and imperfect procedural justice. The article analyzes the political ontology of the pure procedural justice of blockchain-technology. This ontology relies not on the legal nature of interaction in the network, but on the technical and social immediacy of trust, cooperation and co-production. The empirical basis of the study is the analysis of cases of using blockchain-voting on the platform of “Active Citizen” (Moscow).

KW - Active citizen

KW - Autonomous identity

KW - Blockchain

KW - Collaboration

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Reciprocity

KW - Reputation

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057097077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/blockchain-problem-procedural-justice-public-choice

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783030028428

T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science

SP - 13

EP - 23

BT - Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers

A2 - Boukhanovsky, Alexander V.

A2 - Chugunov, Andrei V.

A2 - Alexandrov, Daniel A.

A2 - Kabanov, Yury

A2 - Koltsova, Olessia

PB - Springer

ER -

Smorgunov L. Blockchain and a problem of procedural justice of public choice. В Boukhanovsky AV, Chugunov AV, Alexandrov DA, Kabanov Y, Koltsova O, редакторы, Digital Transformation and Global Society - Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, Revised Selected Papers. Springer. 2018. стр. 13-23. 2. (Communications in Computer and Information Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_2