АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ РАВНЫХ И РОЖДЕНИЕ ИСТИНЫ В СПОРЕ

Elena N. Lisanyuk, Maria R. Mazurova

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатья

Выдержка

We suggest a solution to the problem of peer disagreement based on the concept of divergence in opinions, imported from the theory of argumentation. We treat the problem of peer disagreement as a mental experiment, a duel between different concepts of truth, and show that there is no winner in it, whenever there is a deep disagreement between epistemic peers. Our approach amounts to two proposals, one formulates how to handle the truth and the other takes care of creating an agreement over it. We suggest that instead of employing a definite concept of truth taken as criterion for dispute resolution from outside of it, the agents construct the concept of truth as a joint design project from the inside of their dispute and create an agreement towards it with the help of a procedure based on the of divergence in opinions. The concept of divergence of opinions opens a perspective of analyzing complex conflicts such as the deep disagreements by treating them as molecular disputes consisting of atomic simple ones. It supports discriminating between solvable and unsolvable disputes and paves a way for the disputants to construe a truth concept in their complex dispute by choosing in which of the atomic disputes to participate for the sake of their molecular dispute resolution. We also demonstrate how the conceptions discussed in the issues of the peer disagreement such as conciliatory and steadfast ways, justificatory balance and equal weight view get shape in our approach based on the concept of divergence in opinions.

Язык оригиналарусский
Страницы (с-по)81-100
Число страниц20
ЖурналЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ
Том56
Номер выпуска1
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 1 янв 2019

Отпечаток

Peer Disagreement
Argumentation
Dispute
Divergence
Dispute Resolution
Experiment
Duel
Conception
Peers
Definites
Argumentation Theory

Ключевые слова

  • разногласие равных
  • глубокое разногласие
  • Конфликт
  • ИСТИНА
  • спор
  • расхождение во мнениях
  • аргументация, отменяемые рассуждения, логика действий, деятельность, рациональные, агенты, пересмотр убеждений, прагматика, риторика, диалог, коммуникация

Предметные области Scopus

  • Философия

Цитировать

@article{45f8609ac73e4945ab94122abad76b68,
title = "АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ РАВНЫХ И РОЖДЕНИЕ ИСТИНЫ В СПОРЕ",
abstract = "We suggest a solution to the problem of peer disagreement based on the concept of divergence in opinions, imported from the theory of argumentation. We treat the problem of peer disagreement as a mental experiment, a duel between different concepts of truth, and show that there is no winner in it, whenever there is a deep disagreement between epistemic peers. Our approach amounts to two proposals, one formulates how to handle the truth and the other takes care of creating an agreement over it. We suggest that instead of employing a definite concept of truth taken as criterion for dispute resolution from outside of it, the agents construct the concept of truth as a joint design project from the inside of their dispute and create an agreement towards it with the help of a procedure based on the of divergence in opinions. The concept of divergence of opinions opens a perspective of analyzing complex conflicts such as the deep disagreements by treating them as molecular disputes consisting of atomic simple ones. It supports discriminating between solvable and unsolvable disputes and paves a way for the disputants to construe a truth concept in their complex dispute by choosing in which of the atomic disputes to participate for the sake of their molecular dispute resolution. We also demonstrate how the conceptions discussed in the issues of the peer disagreement such as conciliatory and steadfast ways, justificatory balance and equal weight view get shape in our approach based on the concept of divergence in opinions.",
keywords = "разногласие равных, глубокое разногласие, Конфликт, ИСТИНА, спор, расхождение во мнениях, аргументация, отменяемые рассуждения, логика действий, деятельность, рациональные, агенты, пересмотр убеждений, прагматика, риторика, диалог, коммуникация",
author = "Lisanyuk, {Elena N.} and Mazurova, {Maria R.}",
note = "DOI: 10.5840/eps20195619",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/eps20195619",
language = "русский",
volume = "56",
pages = "81--100",
journal = "ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ",
issn = "1811-833X",
publisher = "Институт философии РАН",
number = "1",

}

АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ РАВНЫХ И РОЖДЕНИЕ ИСТИНЫ В СПОРЕ. / Lisanyuk, Elena N.; Mazurova, Maria R.

В: ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ, Том 56, № 1, 01.01.2019, стр. 81-100.

Результат исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатья

TY - JOUR

T1 - АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ, РАЗНОГЛАСИЕ РАВНЫХ И РОЖДЕНИЕ ИСТИНЫ В СПОРЕ

AU - Lisanyuk, Elena N.

AU - Mazurova, Maria R.

N1 - DOI: 10.5840/eps20195619

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We suggest a solution to the problem of peer disagreement based on the concept of divergence in opinions, imported from the theory of argumentation. We treat the problem of peer disagreement as a mental experiment, a duel between different concepts of truth, and show that there is no winner in it, whenever there is a deep disagreement between epistemic peers. Our approach amounts to two proposals, one formulates how to handle the truth and the other takes care of creating an agreement over it. We suggest that instead of employing a definite concept of truth taken as criterion for dispute resolution from outside of it, the agents construct the concept of truth as a joint design project from the inside of their dispute and create an agreement towards it with the help of a procedure based on the of divergence in opinions. The concept of divergence of opinions opens a perspective of analyzing complex conflicts such as the deep disagreements by treating them as molecular disputes consisting of atomic simple ones. It supports discriminating between solvable and unsolvable disputes and paves a way for the disputants to construe a truth concept in their complex dispute by choosing in which of the atomic disputes to participate for the sake of their molecular dispute resolution. We also demonstrate how the conceptions discussed in the issues of the peer disagreement such as conciliatory and steadfast ways, justificatory balance and equal weight view get shape in our approach based on the concept of divergence in opinions.

AB - We suggest a solution to the problem of peer disagreement based on the concept of divergence in opinions, imported from the theory of argumentation. We treat the problem of peer disagreement as a mental experiment, a duel between different concepts of truth, and show that there is no winner in it, whenever there is a deep disagreement between epistemic peers. Our approach amounts to two proposals, one formulates how to handle the truth and the other takes care of creating an agreement over it. We suggest that instead of employing a definite concept of truth taken as criterion for dispute resolution from outside of it, the agents construct the concept of truth as a joint design project from the inside of their dispute and create an agreement towards it with the help of a procedure based on the of divergence in opinions. The concept of divergence of opinions opens a perspective of analyzing complex conflicts such as the deep disagreements by treating them as molecular disputes consisting of atomic simple ones. It supports discriminating between solvable and unsolvable disputes and paves a way for the disputants to construe a truth concept in their complex dispute by choosing in which of the atomic disputes to participate for the sake of their molecular dispute resolution. We also demonstrate how the conceptions discussed in the issues of the peer disagreement such as conciliatory and steadfast ways, justificatory balance and equal weight view get shape in our approach based on the concept of divergence in opinions.

KW - разногласие равных

KW - глубокое разногласие

KW - Конфликт

KW - ИСТИНА

KW - спор

KW - расхождение во мнениях

KW - аргументация, отменяемые рассуждения, логика действий, деятельность, рациональные, агенты, пересмотр убеждений, прагматика, риторика, диалог, коммуникация

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066155089&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5840/eps20195619

DO - 10.5840/eps20195619

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85066155089

VL - 56

SP - 81

EP - 100

JO - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

JF - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

SN - 1811-833X

IS - 1

ER -