Standard

The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species? / Golikova, Elena; Korsun, Sergei.

Young Systematists’ Forum. 2016. p. 10.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference abstracts › Research

Harvard

Golikova, E & Korsun, S 2016, The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species? in Young Systematists’ Forum. pp. 10, Young Systematists’ Forum, London, United Kingdom, 25/11/16.

APA

Golikova, E., & Korsun, S. (2016). The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species? In Young Systematists’ Forum (pp. 10)

Vancouver

Golikova E, Korsun S. The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species? In Young Systematists’ Forum. 2016. p. 10

Author

Golikova, Elena ; Korsun, Sergei. / The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species?. Young Systematists’ Forum. 2016. pp. 10

BibTeX

@inbook{ced544ee73624941963ea9ffdc4dd234,
title = "The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species?",
abstract = "The cosmopolitan intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata (Montagu) is extensively used in both paleoenvironmentalreconstructions and ecological surveys of salt-marsh foraminifera, and therefore it needs correct identification. Images publishedover years depict differences in test shape, umbilicus features, incurvation of sutures, and number of chambers in the last whorl.For instance, Montagu (1808) described a 5-chambered specimen; revised description of Williamson (1858) as well as theneotype description (Br{\"o}nnimann & Whittaker, 1984) reported 6 chambers. Recent White Sea specimens — 7-chambered,otherwise similar — inspired Mayer (1962) to propose a new subspecies ―Trochammina inflata (Montagu) subsp. n.?‖, but thiswork was not finalised. Recently collected White Sea specimens of T. inflata perfectly fit to Mayer{\textquoteleft}s description. It raises thequestion whether it is possible to distinguish a new (sub)species based on the number of chambers or we are dealing with alocal morph of T. inflata.",
author = "Elena Golikova and Sergei Korsun",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "10",
booktitle = "Young Systematists{\textquoteright} Forum",
note = "null ; Conference date: 25-11-2016 Through 25-11-2016",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata with a distinct morphotype in the White Sea, Russian Arctic: a local variety or new species?

AU - Golikova, Elena

AU - Korsun, Sergei

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The cosmopolitan intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata (Montagu) is extensively used in both paleoenvironmentalreconstructions and ecological surveys of salt-marsh foraminifera, and therefore it needs correct identification. Images publishedover years depict differences in test shape, umbilicus features, incurvation of sutures, and number of chambers in the last whorl.For instance, Montagu (1808) described a 5-chambered specimen; revised description of Williamson (1858) as well as theneotype description (Brönnimann & Whittaker, 1984) reported 6 chambers. Recent White Sea specimens — 7-chambered,otherwise similar — inspired Mayer (1962) to propose a new subspecies ―Trochammina inflata (Montagu) subsp. n.?‖, but thiswork was not finalised. Recently collected White Sea specimens of T. inflata perfectly fit to Mayer‘s description. It raises thequestion whether it is possible to distinguish a new (sub)species based on the number of chambers or we are dealing with alocal morph of T. inflata.

AB - The cosmopolitan intertidal foraminifer Trochammina inflata (Montagu) is extensively used in both paleoenvironmentalreconstructions and ecological surveys of salt-marsh foraminifera, and therefore it needs correct identification. Images publishedover years depict differences in test shape, umbilicus features, incurvation of sutures, and number of chambers in the last whorl.For instance, Montagu (1808) described a 5-chambered specimen; revised description of Williamson (1858) as well as theneotype description (Brönnimann & Whittaker, 1984) reported 6 chambers. Recent White Sea specimens — 7-chambered,otherwise similar — inspired Mayer (1962) to propose a new subspecies ―Trochammina inflata (Montagu) subsp. n.?‖, but thiswork was not finalised. Recently collected White Sea specimens of T. inflata perfectly fit to Mayer‘s description. It raises thequestion whether it is possible to distinguish a new (sub)species based on the number of chambers or we are dealing with alocal morph of T. inflata.

UR - https://systass.org/events/ysf/

M3 - Conference abstracts

SP - 10

BT - Young Systematists’ Forum

Y2 - 25 November 2016 through 25 November 2016

ER -

ID: 106731259