The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scientific researches on the legal regulations of the fight against doping are carried out mainly in the Western doctrine within the framework of International law, Sports law, human rights, and European Union law. In post-Soviet legal science there is an intensive growth in the number of sports research, mainly sectoral (administrative, constitutional, labor, criminal law). However, there is practically no research on FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations. There is a difference between the two forms of anti-doping rule violation: the first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample, the second form is the use of a prohibited substance by an athlete. In this study, we will analyze the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (hereinafter – CAS, arbitration) in cases of anti-doping regulation violations on issues of fault or negligence in football and draw conclusions, what facts can be accepted by the arbitration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-101
JournalRussian Journal of Comparative Law
Volume6
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2019

Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Keywords

  • fault or negligence in anti-doping cases
  • significant fault or negligence antidoping cases
  • football anti-doping regulations
  • FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • practice of CAS

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this