Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review
Study of conceptual bases of software functioning for the representation of deliberative argumentation. / Lisanyuk, Elena; Prokudin, Dmitry.
In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2813, 2021, p. 22-31.Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Study of conceptual bases of software functioning for the representation of deliberative argumentation
AU - Lisanyuk, Elena
AU - Prokudin, Dmitry
N1 - Conference code: 23
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Deliberative reasoning is widely used in various fields of human activity. In the modern information society, the use of methods of deliberative argumentation is associated with the development and use of appropriate application software, which is intended for visualization and modeling of intellectual activity to solve various types of practical problems, as well as argumentation. At the same time, various software designed for modeling and representation of argumentation explicitly or implicitly contains its conceptual grounds for argumentation. In this study, based on the identification of software intended for the simulation of deliberative reasoning, analysis of its purpose and main functions, the conceptual foundations of their functioning are determined, which is the initial stage for the formulation of a body of criteria for evaluating this software and its subsequent classification. The authors propose two preliminary independent classifications based on conceptual grounds, which are significant characteristics for the classification of the corresponding software.
AB - Deliberative reasoning is widely used in various fields of human activity. In the modern information society, the use of methods of deliberative argumentation is associated with the development and use of appropriate application software, which is intended for visualization and modeling of intellectual activity to solve various types of practical problems, as well as argumentation. At the same time, various software designed for modeling and representation of argumentation explicitly or implicitly contains its conceptual grounds for argumentation. In this study, based on the identification of software intended for the simulation of deliberative reasoning, analysis of its purpose and main functions, the conceptual foundations of their functioning are determined, which is the initial stage for the formulation of a body of criteria for evaluating this software and its subsequent classification. The authors propose two preliminary independent classifications based on conceptual grounds, which are significant characteristics for the classification of the corresponding software.
KW - Conceptual bases
KW - Deliberative reasoning
KW - Modeling
KW - Representation
KW - Software
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101598135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85101598135
VL - 2813
SP - 22
EP - 31
JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
SN - 1613-0073
T2 - Internet and Modern Society
Y2 - 17 June 2020 through 20 June 2020
ER -
ID: 73953045