A mathematical definition for the assertion ‘a group of criteria A is more important than a group of criteria B’ is introduced. It is shown how quantitative information on relative importance of criteria allows us to obtain a more precise upper estimate for a set of all non-dominated solutions than the well-known Pareto set.
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 1997|
Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Strategy and Management