Abstract
A mathematical definition for the assertion ‘a group of criteria A is more important than a group of criteria B’ is introduced. It is shown how quantitative information on relative importance of criteria allows us to obtain a more precise upper estimate for a set of all non-dominated solutions than the well-known Pareto set.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 355-363 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1997 |
Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Strategy and Management