Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

Translated title of the contributionПаттерны эмоциональной аргументации в дискуссиях в Twitter
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPatterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions
PublisherSpringer
Pages72 - 79
Number of pages7
EditionLNCS
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Cite this

@inproceedings{6e1f69d53774485e952f4c19a84925ef,
title = "Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions",
author = "Нигматуллина, {Камилла Ренатовна} and Бодрунова, {Светлана Сергеевна}",
note = "Nigmatullina K., Bodrunova S.S. (2019) Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions. In: Bodrunova S. et al. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11551. Springer, Cham",
year = "2019",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_7",
language = "English",
pages = "72 -- 79",
booktitle = "Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Germany",
edition = "LNCS",

}

Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions. / Нигматуллина, Камилла Ренатовна; Бодрунова, Светлана Сергеевна.

Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions. LNCS. ed. Springer, 2019. p. 72 - 79.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions

AU - Нигматуллина, Камилла Ренатовна

AU - Бодрунова, Светлана Сергеевна

N1 - Nigmatullina K., Bodrunova S.S. (2019) Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions. In: Bodrunova S. et al. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11551. Springer, Cham

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_7

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17705-8_7

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 72

EP - 79

BT - Patterns of Emotional Argumentation in Twitter Discussions

PB - Springer

ER -