On the possibility of "negotiations" in historical epistemology

Research output

Abstract

This paper describes the possible compatibility of positions of the discussion participants on the current project of historical epistemology. The tension between descriptive and normative elements of this project is determined as one of the most important issue. I make an assumption of a philosophical nature of historical epistemology that does not detract from, but supports the historicity of thinking science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-55
Number of pages4
JournalEpistemology and Philosophy of Science
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Historical Epistemology
Historicity
Descriptive
Compatibility

Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{75057bd67fc545daa3d7eeeebb99301a,
title = "On the possibility of {"}negotiations{"} in historical epistemology",
abstract = "This paper describes the possible compatibility of positions of the discussion participants on the current project of historical epistemology. The tension between descriptive and normative elements of this project is determined as one of the most important issue. I make an assumption of a philosophical nature of historical epistemology that does not detract from, but supports the historicity of thinking science.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Diversity, Equality, Reflection",
author = "Lada Shipovalova",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/eps20175118",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "52--55",
journal = "ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ",
issn = "1811-833X",
publisher = "Институт философии РАН",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the possibility of "negotiations" in historical epistemology

AU - Shipovalova, Lada

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This paper describes the possible compatibility of positions of the discussion participants on the current project of historical epistemology. The tension between descriptive and normative elements of this project is determined as one of the most important issue. I make an assumption of a philosophical nature of historical epistemology that does not detract from, but supports the historicity of thinking science.

AB - This paper describes the possible compatibility of positions of the discussion participants on the current project of historical epistemology. The tension between descriptive and normative elements of this project is determined as one of the most important issue. I make an assumption of a philosophical nature of historical epistemology that does not detract from, but supports the historicity of thinking science.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Diversity

KW - Equality

KW - Reflection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033695355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5840/eps20175118

DO - 10.5840/eps20175118

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85033695355

VL - 51

SP - 52

EP - 55

JO - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

JF - ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ НАУКИ

SN - 1811-833X

IS - 1

ER -