Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
"Observer effect" in late 19th and early 20th century measurements of vowel characteristic tones. / Kochetkova, Ulyana ; Skrelin, Pavel .
Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 . ed. / Sasha Calhoun Calhoun; Paola Escudero; Marija Tabain; Paul Warren. Canberra, Australia : Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc, 2019. p. 1917-1921 1966.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - "Observer effect" in late 19th and early 20th century measurements of vowel characteristic tones
AU - Kochetkova, Ulyana
AU - Skrelin, Pavel
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - In the late 19th and early 20th century various tools and techniques existed for vowel characteristic tone measurements, including the use of such instruments as tuning forks and resonators. This subtle method demanding from the researcher a sensitive ear and a good training nevertheless remained subjective and depended to a great extent on the explorer’s will. Contrary to modern data descriptions, most of vowel measurements were given as precise single values and not as value areas. Thus several questions arise: what are the possible reasons underlying the choice of a concrete value by a researcher? Could this choice be deliberate? Was it due to the measuring technique imperfection? What role could tradition and psychological aspect play? In order to answer these questions, values suggested by Helmholtz, Koenig and Rousselot are analyzed in the present study in correlation with the descriptions of measurement methods existing at that time
AB - In the late 19th and early 20th century various tools and techniques existed for vowel characteristic tone measurements, including the use of such instruments as tuning forks and resonators. This subtle method demanding from the researcher a sensitive ear and a good training nevertheless remained subjective and depended to a great extent on the explorer’s will. Contrary to modern data descriptions, most of vowel measurements were given as precise single values and not as value areas. Thus several questions arise: what are the possible reasons underlying the choice of a concrete value by a researcher? Could this choice be deliberate? Was it due to the measuring technique imperfection? What role could tradition and psychological aspect play? In order to answer these questions, values suggested by Helmholtz, Koenig and Rousselot are analyzed in the present study in correlation with the descriptions of measurement methods existing at that time
KW - vowel formants
KW - music intervals
KW - scales
KW - tuning forks
KW - French phonetics
KW - history of linguistics
KW - phonetic features
M3 - Conference contribution
SP - 1917
EP - 1921
BT - Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019
A2 - Calhoun, Sasha Calhoun
A2 - Escudero, Paola
A2 - Tabain, Marija
A2 - Warren, Paul
PB - Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc
CY - Canberra, Australia
Y2 - 5 August 2019 through 9 August 2019
ER -
ID: 47449632