Standard

Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries. / Sychenko, Elena; Laruccia, Mauro; Cusciano, Dalton; Chikireva, Irina; Wang, Jiaojiao; Smit, Paul.

In: BRICS Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2020, p. 4-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Sychenko, E, Laruccia, M, Cusciano, D, Chikireva, I, Wang, J & Smit, P 2020, 'Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries', BRICS Law Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4-44. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44

APA

Sychenko, E., Laruccia, M., Cusciano, D., Chikireva, I., Wang, J., & Smit, P. (2020). Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal, 7(4), 4-44. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44

Vancouver

Sychenko E, Laruccia M, Cusciano D, Chikireva I, Wang J, Smit P. Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries. BRICS Law Journal. 2020;7(4):4-44. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44

Author

Sychenko, Elena ; Laruccia, Mauro ; Cusciano, Dalton ; Chikireva, Irina ; Wang, Jiaojiao ; Smit, Paul. / Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries. In: BRICS Law Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 4-44.

BibTeX

@article{230bb021372f4354b24aa875b57931fa,
title = "Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries",
abstract = "Non-standardization of employment has become the main trend of the labour markets in the globalized economy. Attempting to enhance the flexibility of employment relations the legislators in BRICS countries are also the part of this trend. The forms of the nonstandard employment are numerous, the present paper concentrates upon the following ones: temporary employment, part-time and multi-party employment relationship. The authors review the experience of four BRICS countries in regulating non-standard forms of employment and determine what were the specific reasons for adopting them in Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa. The national parts are introduced by the consideration of the international standards of protection of employees working under non-standard contracts. It is argued that even though these four states did not ratify the ILO Convention No. 181 Private Employment Agencies Convention (1997) and only Russia ratified ILO Part-Time Work Convention (No. 175), the ILO approach has influenced the development of national regulations. Though the equal treatment of all workers is lacking in many aspects of employment relations. In the national parts the authors trace the changes in employment law which reflect the pursuit of flexibilization of the labour market and, as in Brazil, the need to formalize employment relations.",
keywords = "BRICS, Formalization of employment, Non-standard employment, Part-time work, Shortterm employment, Temporary agency work",
author = "Elena Sychenko and Mauro Laruccia and Dalton Cusciano and Irina Chikireva and Jiaojiao Wang and Paul Smit",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, University of Tyumen. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "4--44",
journal = "BRICS Law Journal",
issn = "2409-9058",
publisher = "Тюменский государственный университет",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-standard employment in the BRICS countries

AU - Sychenko, Elena

AU - Laruccia, Mauro

AU - Cusciano, Dalton

AU - Chikireva, Irina

AU - Wang, Jiaojiao

AU - Smit, Paul

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, University of Tyumen. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Non-standardization of employment has become the main trend of the labour markets in the globalized economy. Attempting to enhance the flexibility of employment relations the legislators in BRICS countries are also the part of this trend. The forms of the nonstandard employment are numerous, the present paper concentrates upon the following ones: temporary employment, part-time and multi-party employment relationship. The authors review the experience of four BRICS countries in regulating non-standard forms of employment and determine what were the specific reasons for adopting them in Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa. The national parts are introduced by the consideration of the international standards of protection of employees working under non-standard contracts. It is argued that even though these four states did not ratify the ILO Convention No. 181 Private Employment Agencies Convention (1997) and only Russia ratified ILO Part-Time Work Convention (No. 175), the ILO approach has influenced the development of national regulations. Though the equal treatment of all workers is lacking in many aspects of employment relations. In the national parts the authors trace the changes in employment law which reflect the pursuit of flexibilization of the labour market and, as in Brazil, the need to formalize employment relations.

AB - Non-standardization of employment has become the main trend of the labour markets in the globalized economy. Attempting to enhance the flexibility of employment relations the legislators in BRICS countries are also the part of this trend. The forms of the nonstandard employment are numerous, the present paper concentrates upon the following ones: temporary employment, part-time and multi-party employment relationship. The authors review the experience of four BRICS countries in regulating non-standard forms of employment and determine what were the specific reasons for adopting them in Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa. The national parts are introduced by the consideration of the international standards of protection of employees working under non-standard contracts. It is argued that even though these four states did not ratify the ILO Convention No. 181 Private Employment Agencies Convention (1997) and only Russia ratified ILO Part-Time Work Convention (No. 175), the ILO approach has influenced the development of national regulations. Though the equal treatment of all workers is lacking in many aspects of employment relations. In the national parts the authors trace the changes in employment law which reflect the pursuit of flexibilization of the labour market and, as in Brazil, the need to formalize employment relations.

KW - BRICS

KW - Formalization of employment

KW - Non-standard employment

KW - Part-time work

KW - Shortterm employment

KW - Temporary agency work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098711768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44

DO - 10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-4-44

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85098711768

VL - 7

SP - 4

EP - 44

JO - BRICS Law Journal

JF - BRICS Law Journal

SN - 2409-9058

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 72827890