Standard

Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia. / Pavlova, Elena; Morozov, Viatcheslav.

In: Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 689−716.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Pavlova, E & Morozov, V 2018, 'Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia', Journal of International Relations and Development, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 689−716. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.

APA

Pavlova, E., & Morozov, V. (2018). Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21(3), 689−716. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.

Vancouver

Pavlova E, Morozov V. Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2018 Jul 1;21(3):689−716. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.

Author

Pavlova, Elena ; Morozov, Viatcheslav. / Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia. In: Journal of International Relations and Development. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 689−716.

BibTeX

@article{6bdec9277aa04a9587238faf2b81ed9f,
title = "Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia",
abstract = "The decolonial discourse of buen vivir in South America has declared the need to overcome Eurocentrism by tapping into indigenous knowledge. We compare the Bolivian version of this project with the conservative turn in Russian politics to demonstrate that they make a structurally analogous argument and they both end up with a false promise. The fullness of indigenous being that underlies such discourses is a Eurocentric, romanticist myth, which contributes to the silencing of the subaltern by imposing on them political categories not directly rooted in any genuine native experience. We reformulate postcolonial critique using Laclau's theory of populism to suggest that subaltern subjectivity can only emerge in a bottom-up manner, through the aggregation and universalisation of local demands. While it might still be true that the subaltern cannot speak, there is no way for the subaltern to come into being other than through speaking politically.",
keywords = "Bolivia, indigeneity, postcolonial theory, Russia, subalternity, subjectivity",
author = "Elena Pavlova and Viatcheslav Morozov",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "689−716",
journal = "Journal of International Relations and Development",
issn = "1408-6980",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indigeneity and subaltern subjectivity in decolonial discourses: a comparative study of Bolivia and Russia

AU - Pavlova, Elena

AU - Morozov, Viatcheslav

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - The decolonial discourse of buen vivir in South America has declared the need to overcome Eurocentrism by tapping into indigenous knowledge. We compare the Bolivian version of this project with the conservative turn in Russian politics to demonstrate that they make a structurally analogous argument and they both end up with a false promise. The fullness of indigenous being that underlies such discourses is a Eurocentric, romanticist myth, which contributes to the silencing of the subaltern by imposing on them political categories not directly rooted in any genuine native experience. We reformulate postcolonial critique using Laclau's theory of populism to suggest that subaltern subjectivity can only emerge in a bottom-up manner, through the aggregation and universalisation of local demands. While it might still be true that the subaltern cannot speak, there is no way for the subaltern to come into being other than through speaking politically.

AB - The decolonial discourse of buen vivir in South America has declared the need to overcome Eurocentrism by tapping into indigenous knowledge. We compare the Bolivian version of this project with the conservative turn in Russian politics to demonstrate that they make a structurally analogous argument and they both end up with a false promise. The fullness of indigenous being that underlies such discourses is a Eurocentric, romanticist myth, which contributes to the silencing of the subaltern by imposing on them political categories not directly rooted in any genuine native experience. We reformulate postcolonial critique using Laclau's theory of populism to suggest that subaltern subjectivity can only emerge in a bottom-up manner, through the aggregation and universalisation of local demands. While it might still be true that the subaltern cannot speak, there is no way for the subaltern to come into being other than through speaking politically.

KW - Bolivia

KW - indigeneity

KW - postcolonial theory

KW - Russia

KW - subalternity

KW - subjectivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029737847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.

DO - 10.1057/s41268-016-0076-7.

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 689−716

JO - Journal of International Relations and Development

JF - Journal of International Relations and Development

SN - 1408-6980

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 7596923