Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena

Research output

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to investigate the manifestations of animacy in the Latin language and, particularly, the phenomena which pertain to the periphery of this category. Since reliable criteria to establish whether a noun is animate or not are lacking in the traditional Latin grammars, this study aims, first, at offering a method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy and, second, at explaining some peripheral phenomena. The method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy is based on differences in syntactic behavior of animate/inanimate nouns in passive constructions. The author draws on comparative material from some other languages, with a particular focus on Russian, and comes to the conclusion that the conceptualization of entities as animate/inanimate can be influenced by the grammatical number, the degree of individuation and by other parameters pertaining to the anthropocentric nature of language.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLemmata Linguistica Latina
Subtitle of host publicationClause and Discourse
EditorsLidewij van Gils, Caroline Croon, Rodie Risselada
Place of PublicationBerlin/Munich/Boston
PublisherDe Gruyter
Pages199-218
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9783110678222
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Animacy
Latin Language
Language
Animate
Entity
Individuation
Manifestation
Latin Grammar
Nouns
Syntax
Anthropocentric
Inanimate Nouns
Grammatical number
Conceptualization

Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Zheltova , E. (2019). Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. In L. van Gils, C. Croon, & R. Risselada (Eds.), Lemmata Linguistica Latina: Clause and Discourse (Vol. 2, pp. 199-218). Berlin/Munich/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222-011
Zheltova , Elena . / Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. Lemmata Linguistica Latina: Clause and Discourse. editor / Lidewij van Gils ; Caroline Croon ; Rodie Risselada. Vol. 2 Berlin/Munich/Boston : De Gruyter, 2019. pp. 199-218
@inproceedings{9d13c628c4b8498888277dc43d632ccf,
title = "Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena",
abstract = "The aim of this chapter is to investigate the manifestations of animacy in the Latin language and, particularly, the phenomena which pertain to the periphery of this category. Since reliable criteria to establish whether a noun is animate or not are lacking in the traditional Latin grammars, this study aims, first, at offering a method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy and, second, at explaining some peripheral phenomena. The method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy is based on differences in syntactic behavior of animate/inanimate nouns in passive constructions. The author draws on comparative material from some other languages, with a particular focus on Russian, and comes to the conclusion that the conceptualization of entities as animate/inanimate can be influenced by the grammatical number, the degree of individuation and by other parameters pertaining to the anthropocentric nature of language.",
author = "Elena Zheltova",
note = "Elena Zheltova (2019). Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. In Lidewij van Gils, Caroline Kroon, Rodie Risselada (Eds.), Clause and Discourse (pp. 199–218). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222-011 Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1515/9783110678222-011",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "199--218",
editor = "{van Gils}, {Lidewij } and Caroline Croon and Rodie Risselada",
booktitle = "Lemmata Linguistica Latina",
publisher = "De Gruyter",
address = "Germany",

}

Zheltova , E 2019, Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. in L van Gils, C Croon & R Risselada (eds), Lemmata Linguistica Latina: Clause and Discourse. vol. 2, De Gruyter, Berlin/Munich/Boston, pp. 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222-011

Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. / Zheltova , Elena .

Lemmata Linguistica Latina: Clause and Discourse. ed. / Lidewij van Gils; Caroline Croon; Rodie Risselada. Vol. 2 Berlin/Munich/Boston : De Gruyter, 2019. p. 199-218.

Research output

TY - GEN

T1 - Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena

AU - Zheltova , Elena

N1 - Elena Zheltova (2019). Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. In Lidewij van Gils, Caroline Kroon, Rodie Risselada (Eds.), Clause and Discourse (pp. 199–218). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222-011 Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The aim of this chapter is to investigate the manifestations of animacy in the Latin language and, particularly, the phenomena which pertain to the periphery of this category. Since reliable criteria to establish whether a noun is animate or not are lacking in the traditional Latin grammars, this study aims, first, at offering a method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy and, second, at explaining some peripheral phenomena. The method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy is based on differences in syntactic behavior of animate/inanimate nouns in passive constructions. The author draws on comparative material from some other languages, with a particular focus on Russian, and comes to the conclusion that the conceptualization of entities as animate/inanimate can be influenced by the grammatical number, the degree of individuation and by other parameters pertaining to the anthropocentric nature of language.

AB - The aim of this chapter is to investigate the manifestations of animacy in the Latin language and, particularly, the phenomena which pertain to the periphery of this category. Since reliable criteria to establish whether a noun is animate or not are lacking in the traditional Latin grammars, this study aims, first, at offering a method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy and, second, at explaining some peripheral phenomena. The method of diagnosing animacy/inanimacy is based on differences in syntactic behavior of animate/inanimate nouns in passive constructions. The author draws on comparative material from some other languages, with a particular focus on Russian, and comes to the conclusion that the conceptualization of entities as animate/inanimate can be influenced by the grammatical number, the degree of individuation and by other parameters pertaining to the anthropocentric nature of language.

U2 - 10.1515/9783110678222-011

DO - 10.1515/9783110678222-011

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2

SP - 199

EP - 218

BT - Lemmata Linguistica Latina

A2 - van Gils, Lidewij

A2 - Croon, Caroline

A2 - Risselada, Rodie

PB - De Gruyter

CY - Berlin/Munich/Boston

ER -

Zheltova E. Animacy in Latin: explaining some peripheral phenomena. In van Gils L, Croon C, Risselada R, editors, Lemmata Linguistica Latina: Clause and Discourse. Vol. 2. Berlin/Munich/Boston: De Gruyter. 2019. p. 199-218 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110678222-011