Agile vs traditional project management approaches: Comparing human resource management architectures

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Agile project management methods gain increasing attention of practitioners while they often remain neglected by scholarly research. Specifically, there is little known about how performance factors of agile firms differ from those of traditional firms. Scholars argue that these factors often relate to a firm’s human resource management (HRM). This study aims to analyze and compare the HRM architectures in agile and traditional project-based organizations that lead to high firm performance. Design/methodology/approach: The authors apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis on data of 154 project-based organizations of diverse professional service industries in Russia. Findings: This study’s findings suggest that HRM architectures of high-performance agile firms imply a broad use of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing practices and a high degree of HRM process centralization, while traditional firms adopt more diverse HRM architectures. Originality/value: Based on this study’s results, the authors stress the importance of ensuring a good fit between a company’s project management approach and HRM architecture. The revealed configurations may also provide guidance for practitioners on designing effective HRM architectures in project-based organizations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1095-1112
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Feb 2020

Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Keywords

  • Agile
  • Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
  • HRM architectures
  • Human resource management
  • Project management
  • Russia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agile vs traditional project management approaches: Comparing human resource management architectures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this