«Олимпийская» виндикация через призму Европейской конвенции о защите прав человека

Translated title of the contribution: ‘OLYMPIC’ VINDICATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTIONON HUMAN RIGHTS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Commentary to the ECHR Judgment in Belova v. Russia, no. 33955/08, 15 September 2020The article offers a critical analysis of the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights on a case related to recovery of immovable property by the State on the eve of the 2014 Winter Olympic Games in Sochi. The author points out a number of controversial issues which may cast doubt on the soundness of the Court’s conclusion that there has been no violation of the Convention in the case at hand.
Translated title of the contribution‘OLYMPIC’ VINDICATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTIONON HUMAN RIGHTS
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)5-18
JournalВестник экономического правосудия Российской Федерации
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • ECHR
  • VINDICATION
  • GOOD FAITH
  • OLYMPIC VENUES
  • OLYMPSTROY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘OLYMPIC’ VINDICATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTIONON HUMAN RIGHTS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this