М.В. Алфимов, Н.Л. Добрецов, Ю.А. Золотов, В.Т. Иванов, В.В. Ивантер, Л.И. Леонтьев, А.А. Макаров, Б.Ф. Мясоедов, Ю.В. Наточин, М.А. Островский, А.Ю. Розанов, И.Г. Ушачев, Ф.Л. Черноусько

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


The article is devoted to the problems of use of indicators of science. Funding depends upon these indicators, and we can see that the idea of these indicators begins to be distorted. Half-finished items - articles which don’t have the logical ending - are published. Fraudulent pay magazines and journals are created to raise the number of publications and linls. People come to an agreement about widespread cross quoting. The quality even of the good authors publications begins to fall because the authors have to get to the target standard. Scientometric evaluation of publications is a large world business which is oriented to clerks, first of all. The selective evaluation of publications rapidly destroys traditions of research in geology, biology, human sciences, etc. In these sciences the main value is concentrated in monographs and need of using monographs has been existing for tens of years. Demands to publish works in foreign upscale journals undermine quality of the Russian journals. The authors offer to
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)1-2
JournalПредставительная власть - XXI век: законодательство, комментарии, проблемы
Issue number4 (171)
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes


  • business
  • index
  • indicators
  • science
  • scientific activities evaluation
  • scientometrics
  • бизнес
  • индекс
  • наука
  • наукометрические показатели
  • наукометрия
  • оценка результатов научно-исследовательской деятельности

Cite this