К ДЕБАТАМ О ТЕОРИИ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ: ПЕРЕОСМЫСЛЕНИЕ МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНОСТИ

Research output

Abstract

This piece is a reaction to the series of articles on the state of IR discipline published in the previous issues of this journal. The authors emphasise the problems of IR theory in Russia (insufficient attention to the current IR trends, ideologization of theories and methods, which leads to numerous difficulties of integration of the Russian academic community into the world academic discussion). Particular attention is paid to the specificity of the formation of new theoretical approaches where interdisciplinary character is the key underlying principle. Ignoring it would seriously limit the capabilities and depth of Russian analytics. To illustrate these points, the article addresses the analysis of the EU Global Strategy - 2016 with 'resilience' as the key category. The article demonstrates inevitability of addressing theory for the sake of analysis of this document as well as for the study of EU-Russian relations at large. The first part of the article examines the specificity of how IR theory is addressed by the Russian academic community. The second part is devoted to the main problems of the contemporary discussion on the essence of IR. The third part gives an illustration of how theoretical approaches can be used to analyse one specific document, which is important for EU-Russian relations.

Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)161-172
Number of pages12
JournalПОЛИС. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Volume2019
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

interdisciplinarity
international relations
EU
resilience
community
Russia
trend

Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{0087b3e5c2e34b618df47323607b7935,
title = "К ДЕБАТАМ О ТЕОРИИ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ: ПЕРЕОСМЫСЛЕНИЕ МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНОСТИ",
abstract = "This piece is a reaction to the series of articles on the state of IR discipline published in the previous issues of this journal. The authors emphasise the problems of IR theory in Russia (insufficient attention to the current IR trends, ideologization of theories and methods, which leads to numerous difficulties of integration of the Russian academic community into the world academic discussion). Particular attention is paid to the specificity of the formation of new theoretical approaches where interdisciplinary character is the key underlying principle. Ignoring it would seriously limit the capabilities and depth of Russian analytics. To illustrate these points, the article addresses the analysis of the EU Global Strategy - 2016 with 'resilience' as the key category. The article demonstrates inevitability of addressing theory for the sake of analysis of this document as well as for the study of EU-Russian relations at large. The first part of the article examines the specificity of how IR theory is addressed by the Russian academic community. The second part is devoted to the main problems of the contemporary discussion on the essence of IR. The third part gives an illustration of how theoretical approaches can be used to analyse one specific document, which is important for EU-Russian relations.",
keywords = "Constructivism, Empirics, Interdisciplinary character, IR theory, Multiplicity, Resilience",
author = "Pavlova, {Elena Borisovna} and Romanova, {Tatiana Alekseevna}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.17976/jpps/2019.02.12",
language = "русский",
volume = "2019",
pages = "161--172",
journal = "ПОЛИС. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ",
issn = "1026-9487",
publisher = "Редакция журнала ПОЛИС: Политические исследования",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - К ДЕБАТАМ О ТЕОРИИ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ

T2 - ПЕРЕОСМЫСЛЕНИЕ МЕЖДИСЦИПЛИНАРНОСТИ

AU - Pavlova, Elena Borisovna

AU - Romanova, Tatiana Alekseevna

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - This piece is a reaction to the series of articles on the state of IR discipline published in the previous issues of this journal. The authors emphasise the problems of IR theory in Russia (insufficient attention to the current IR trends, ideologization of theories and methods, which leads to numerous difficulties of integration of the Russian academic community into the world academic discussion). Particular attention is paid to the specificity of the formation of new theoretical approaches where interdisciplinary character is the key underlying principle. Ignoring it would seriously limit the capabilities and depth of Russian analytics. To illustrate these points, the article addresses the analysis of the EU Global Strategy - 2016 with 'resilience' as the key category. The article demonstrates inevitability of addressing theory for the sake of analysis of this document as well as for the study of EU-Russian relations at large. The first part of the article examines the specificity of how IR theory is addressed by the Russian academic community. The second part is devoted to the main problems of the contemporary discussion on the essence of IR. The third part gives an illustration of how theoretical approaches can be used to analyse one specific document, which is important for EU-Russian relations.

AB - This piece is a reaction to the series of articles on the state of IR discipline published in the previous issues of this journal. The authors emphasise the problems of IR theory in Russia (insufficient attention to the current IR trends, ideologization of theories and methods, which leads to numerous difficulties of integration of the Russian academic community into the world academic discussion). Particular attention is paid to the specificity of the formation of new theoretical approaches where interdisciplinary character is the key underlying principle. Ignoring it would seriously limit the capabilities and depth of Russian analytics. To illustrate these points, the article addresses the analysis of the EU Global Strategy - 2016 with 'resilience' as the key category. The article demonstrates inevitability of addressing theory for the sake of analysis of this document as well as for the study of EU-Russian relations at large. The first part of the article examines the specificity of how IR theory is addressed by the Russian academic community. The second part is devoted to the main problems of the contemporary discussion on the essence of IR. The third part gives an illustration of how theoretical approaches can be used to analyse one specific document, which is important for EU-Russian relations.

KW - Constructivism

KW - Empirics

KW - Interdisciplinary character

KW - IR theory

KW - Multiplicity

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073672724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17976/jpps/2019.02.12

DO - 10.17976/jpps/2019.02.12

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:85073672724

VL - 2019

SP - 161

EP - 172

JO - ПОЛИС. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ

JF - ПОЛИС. ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ

SN - 1026-9487

IS - 2

ER -