Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases

Research outputpeer-review

Abstract

Over half of large digital transformation projects in business practice fail to achieve their predefined goals. One major reason for fail-ure is a lack of readiness. The problem lies in estimating the level of readiness. Existing approaches to evaluating companies’ readiness for digital transformation are different and don’t contain the justification of readiness criteria. The goal of this study is to determine the domains of a model for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation by analysing best practices. The article presents the results of analysing suc-cessful Russian companies implementing complex, large-scale digital transformation projects. The study confirmed the hypothesis of the pres-ence of typical areas of change for companies before implementing pro-jects on digital transformation. To clarify the key areas of change and domain allocation, an analysis of modern management methodologies has been conducted. «Systematic management», «Business processes», «Human resource readiness», «Data management» and «Enterprise ar-chitecture».
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019
EditorsK.S. Soliman
PublisherIBIMA
Pages1505-1513
ISBN (Electronic)978-099985512-6
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event"Education Exellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020 " 33d IBIMA International Conference - Гранада
Duration: 10 Apr 201911 Apr 2019
Conference number: 33d

Conference

Conference"Education Exellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020 " 33d IBIMA International Conference
CountrySpain
CityГранада
Period10/04/1911/04/19

Fingerprint

Readiness
Data management
Business practices
Human resources
Justification
Best practice
Business process management
Methodology

Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Stoianova, O., Ivanova, V., Lezina, T., & Moskaleva, V. (2019). Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases. In K. S. Soliman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019 (pp. 1505-1513). IBIMA.
Stoianova, Olga ; Ivanova, Victoriia ; Lezina, Tatiana ; Moskaleva, Valeriia. / Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases. Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019. editor / K.S. Soliman . IBIMA, 2019. pp. 1505-1513
@inproceedings{1bc33300d63a4700aaa8aa7f6fe17f8c,
title = "Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases",
abstract = "Over half of large digital transformation projects in business practice fail to achieve their predefined goals. One major reason for fail-ure is a lack of readiness. The problem lies in estimating the level of readiness. Existing approaches to evaluating companies’ readiness for digital transformation are different and don’t contain the justification of readiness criteria. The goal of this study is to determine the domains of a model for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation by analysing best practices. The article presents the results of analysing suc-cessful Russian companies implementing complex, large-scale digital transformation projects. The study confirmed the hypothesis of the pres-ence of typical areas of change for companies before implementing pro-jects on digital transformation. To clarify the key areas of change and domain allocation, an analysis of modern management methodologies has been conducted. «Systematic management», «Business processes», «Human resource readiness», «Data management» and «Enterprise ar-chitecture».",
keywords = "digital transformation, the company’s readiness, domains of the framework, criteria of readiness, readiness assessment, Digital transformation, Readiness assessment, Practical cases",
author = "Olga Stoianova and Victoriia Ivanova and Tatiana Lezina and Valeriia Moskaleva",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
pages = "1505--1513",
editor = "{Soliman }, K.S.",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019",
publisher = "IBIMA",
address = "United States",

}

Stoianova, O, Ivanova, V, Lezina, T & Moskaleva, V 2019, Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases. in KS Soliman (ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019. IBIMA, pp. 1505-1513, Гранада , 10/04/19.

Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases. / Stoianova, Olga; Ivanova, Victoriia; Lezina, Tatiana; Moskaleva, Valeriia.

Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019. ed. / K.S. Soliman . IBIMA, 2019. p. 1505-1513.

Research outputpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases

AU - Stoianova, Olga

AU - Ivanova, Victoriia

AU - Lezina, Tatiana

AU - Moskaleva, Valeriia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Over half of large digital transformation projects in business practice fail to achieve their predefined goals. One major reason for fail-ure is a lack of readiness. The problem lies in estimating the level of readiness. Existing approaches to evaluating companies’ readiness for digital transformation are different and don’t contain the justification of readiness criteria. The goal of this study is to determine the domains of a model for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation by analysing best practices. The article presents the results of analysing suc-cessful Russian companies implementing complex, large-scale digital transformation projects. The study confirmed the hypothesis of the pres-ence of typical areas of change for companies before implementing pro-jects on digital transformation. To clarify the key areas of change and domain allocation, an analysis of modern management methodologies has been conducted. «Systematic management», «Business processes», «Human resource readiness», «Data management» and «Enterprise ar-chitecture».

AB - Over half of large digital transformation projects in business practice fail to achieve their predefined goals. One major reason for fail-ure is a lack of readiness. The problem lies in estimating the level of readiness. Existing approaches to evaluating companies’ readiness for digital transformation are different and don’t contain the justification of readiness criteria. The goal of this study is to determine the domains of a model for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation by analysing best practices. The article presents the results of analysing suc-cessful Russian companies implementing complex, large-scale digital transformation projects. The study confirmed the hypothesis of the pres-ence of typical areas of change for companies before implementing pro-jects on digital transformation. To clarify the key areas of change and domain allocation, an analysis of modern management methodologies has been conducted. «Systematic management», «Business processes», «Human resource readiness», «Data management» and «Enterprise ar-chitecture».

KW - digital transformation

KW - the company’s readiness

KW - domains of the framework

KW - criteria of readiness

KW - readiness assessment

KW - Digital transformation

KW - Readiness assessment

KW - Practical cases

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1505

EP - 1513

BT - Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019

A2 - Soliman , K.S.

PB - IBIMA

ER -

Stoianova O, Ivanova V, Lezina T, Moskaleva V. Domains for assessing companies’ readiness for digital transformation: practical cases. In Soliman KS, editor, Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019. IBIMA. 2019. p. 1505-1513